Back to Blog
Engineering

How Top Engineering Teams Approach Test Infrastructure

Learn from the practices of high-performing engineering organizations. From test pyramid strategies to infrastructure-as-code for CI/CD.

Maria RodriguezJanuary 5, 202610 min read

How Top Engineering Teams Approach Test Infrastructure

The difference between a team that ships with confidence and one that dreads deployments often comes down to test infrastructure. Let's explore the practices that separate high-performing engineering organizations from the rest.


The Test Pyramid in Practice

The classic test pyramid (unit → integration → E2E) has been around for decades, but implementing it correctly is nuanced.

Unit Tests: 70% of Coverage

  • Run in milliseconds, not seconds
  • Zero external dependencies (database, network, filesystem)
  • Test one logical unit at a time
  • Execute on every commit, blocking merge on failure

The key insight: unit tests are not about testing implementation details. They test behavior. If you're asserting on private methods or internal state, you're doing it wrong.

Integration Tests: 20% of Coverage

  • Test service boundaries (API contracts, database queries)
  • Use containerized dependencies (Docker Compose, Testcontainers)
  • Run on PR creation, not every commit
  • Focus on happy paths and critical error cases

Integration tests answer: "Do my components work together correctly?"

E2E Tests: 10% of Coverage

  • Cover critical user journeys only (login, checkout, core features)
  • Run on staging deploys, not on every PR
  • Parallelize across browsers/devices when needed
  • Accept some flakiness as inherent to the approach

E2E tests are expensive. Use them sparingly and keep them stable.


Infrastructure Principles

1. Ephemeral Environments

Spin up per-PR test environments that mirror production:

  • Same container images
  • Same network topology
  • Isolated databases with seed data
  • Automatic cleanup after merge

This eliminates "works on my machine" problems.

2. Deterministic Builds

Same input should always produce same output:

  • Pin all dependencies (lockfiles)
  • Use content-addressable storage for artifacts
  • Avoid relying on wall-clock time
  • Seed random number generators

Reproducibility is required for debugging.

3. Parallelization

Don't run tests sequentially when you can run them in parallel:

  • Shard test suites across multiple agents
  • Use test isolation to avoid shared state
  • Balance shards by historical duration
  • Consider per-test parallelization for heavy suites

Goal: reduce wall-clock time, not just CPU time.

4. Observability

Treat CI/CD like production:

  • Metrics: test duration, flakiness rate, queue time
  • Logs: structured logging with request IDs
  • Traces: cross-service test execution visibility
  • Alerts: notify on SLA violations

You can't improve what you don't measure.


Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Testing Implementation Details

Bad: Testing that a private method was called Good: Testing that the public interface behaves correctly

Sleep Statements

Bad: time.sleep(5) and hope it's enough Good: Wait for specific conditions with timeouts

Shared State Between Tests

Bad: Tests that depend on execution order Good: Each test sets up and tears down its own state

Ignoring Flaky Tests

Bad: "It's flaky, just re-run it" Good: Quarantine, track, and fix flaky tests systematically

Running Everything on Every Commit

Bad: 2-hour test suite on every push Good: Fast unit tests on commit, full suite on PR merge


The Testing Trophy

Some teams prefer the "testing trophy" over the pyramid:

  • Static analysis (linting, type checking) at the base
  • Integration tests as the largest section
  • Some unit tests
  • Few E2E tests

The trophy acknowledges that modern tooling catches many bugs at compile time, and integration tests often provide better ROI than unit tests.


Practical Implementation

Start with these questions:

1. What's your current test distribution? (unit/integration/E2E ratio) 2. How long does your full test suite take? 3. What's your flaky test rate? 4. How much time do engineers spend on test maintenance?

Then prioritize improvements based on pain points.


Conclusion

Great test infrastructure is not about running more tests. It's about running the right tests, fast, with clear signals when something breaks.

The teams that invest in test infrastructure compound their velocity over time. Every hour spent on better testing saves hundreds of hours of debugging in production.

Share this article:
Read More Articles